Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of CO2 Solubility in Brine: A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)-Assisted Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The solubility of CO2 in brine systems is critical for both carbon storage and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. In this study, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) with eight different kernels was optimized using the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) algorithm to model this important phase behavior. Among the tested kernels, the ARD Matern 3/2 and ARD Matern 5/2 kernels achieved the highest predictive accuracies, with R2 values of 0.9961 and 0.9960, respectively, on the test data. This demonstrates superior performance in capturing CO2 solubility trends. The GWO algorithm effectively tuned the hyperparameters for all kernel configurations, while the ARD capability successfully quantified the influence of key physicochemical parameters on CO2 solubility. The outstanding performance of the ARD Matern 3/2 and ARD Matern 5/2 kernels suggests their particular suitability for modeling complex thermodynamic behaviors in brine systems. Furthermore, this study integrates fundamental thermodynamic principles into the modeling framework, ensuring all predictions adhere to physical laws while maintaining excellent accuracy (test R2 > 0.98). These results highlight how machine learning can improve CO2 injection processes, both for underground carbon storage and enhanced oil production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".