MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413255033 · doi:10.35833/mpce.2023.000986

Detailed Equivalent Modeling and Simulation of Modular Multilevel Converters with Partially- integrated Battery Energy Storage

2024· article· en· W4413255033 on OpenAlexaff
Ramin Parvari, Shaahin Filizadeh, Ioni Fernando

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsManitoba HydroUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designConvertersBattery (electricity)Energy storageComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringVoltagePower (physics)MathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops a detailed equivalent model for modular multilevel converters with partially-integrated battery energy storage. The proposed model gains computational efficiency in two ways. Firstly, it markedly reduces the large number of nodes in the conventional switching model of the converter, thereby shrinking the size of its admittance matrix. Secondly, it avoids computationally expensive re-triangularization of the admittance matrix during the normal operation of the converter and restricts it only to the rare occasions of converter blocking. Mathematical derivation of the model is carried out using differential equations of the converter. The computational efficiency and accuracy of the proposed model are confirmed by comparison of the results from its implementation in the PSCAD/EM TDC simulator against conventional detailed switching models and measurements from a single-phase scaled-down laboratory setup. This paper also shows a case study wherein a converter with partially-integrated batteries is included in the CIGRE B4-5 benchmark system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Modern Power Systems and Clean EnergySame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207