MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413255852 · doi:10.3389/fmech.2025.1653341

A novel approach to recoil pad enhancement in rifles via topological design with material extrusion and SLA

2025· article· en· W4413255852 on OpenAlexaff
Mamoun Alshihabi, Tülin Bilge, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Shafahat Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Mechanical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
KeywordsMaterials scienceRecoilComposite materialExtrusionVibrationStiffnessMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringAcousticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excessive recoil in firearms reduces shooting accuracy, causes user discomfort, and increases mechanical wear over time. This creates a need for effective solutions that can improve recoil management. This study investigates the use of advanced lattice structures made from thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and resin to enhance vibration damping and impact absorption in firearm components. Four lattice geometries were used, including Voronoi, Weaire Phelan, Gyroid, and Kelvin Cell. These structures were fabricated using two additive manufacturing methods. Material extrusion was applied for TPU parts to provide flexibility and strength, while Stereolithography (SLA), a light-based resin curing technique, was used to produce intricate resin structures. These approaches highlight the adaptability of additive manufacturing in producing functional parts that offer both vibration control and impact resistance. The performance of each structure was evaluated through vibration damping in two modes, rapid impact testing, and compression strength assessments. TPU samples consistently outperformed resin in both damping and energy absorption. Voronoi TPU exhibited the highest damping ratio, improving by 331 percent in the first mode with a value of 1.25 and by 300 percent in the second mode with a value of 0.20 compared to the original solid part. Weaire Phelan TPU reached the highest impact energy absorption at 6.45 joules, which is an improvement of 18.14 percent. Gyroid TPU absorbed energy the fastest, reaching a peak of 5.4 joules in only 14 milliseconds. This study introduces a new design approach by applying lattice structures to recoil pads, enabling enhanced performance and a high degree of customization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207