Operational and Environmental Stability Assessment of Silicon and Copper Phthalocyanine‐Based OTFTs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract When developing new materials for organic electronics, understanding how they will perform and change over time is critical. Typical bias stress exposure experiments provide limited information on the materials’ performance in applications which involve multiple charging and discharging steps. Here, organic thin film transistors (OTFTs) are characterized for 48–72 h straight in air and in N 2 using newly developed cyclic testing protocols that enable statistically significant evaluation of four different semiconductors by quantifying both, environmental and operational stress on their performance. It is demonstrated that the structure of the phthalocyanine leads to significant differences in response to bias stress, such as silicon bis(pentafluorophenoxy)phthalocyanine (F 10 ‐SiPc) showing a much more air‐stable p ‐type device compared to copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) and bis(pentafluorophenoxy) hexadecafluoro silicon(iv) phthalocyanine (F 5 PhO) 2 ‐F 16 ‐SiPc showing much more air‐stable n ‐type performance compared to Copper(II) 1,2,3,4,8,9,10,11,15,16,17,18,22,23,24,25‐hexadecafluoro‐29H,31H‐phthalocyanine (F 16 ‐CuPc). Raman microscopy of the films revealed no changes in morphology. The devices are also modeled using the 2D finite‐element method, which suggests that most changes in device performance are due to fixed charges at the semiconductor/insulator interface. Overall, OTFT stress testing demonstrates, that important structure property relationships can be established between semiconductor molecular structure and device performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it