MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413258825 · doi:10.5376/mgg.2025.16.0006

Advances in the Collection and Utilization of Fresh-Eating Maize Germplasm Resources

2025· article· en· W4413258825 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xingzhu Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueMaize Genomics and Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermplasmBiotechnologyAgronomyAgroforestryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the core foundation of fresh corn breeding, germplasm resources play a key role in the selection and industrial application of new varieties. This study summarizes the progress of the collection and utilization of fresh corn germplasm resources, focusing on the development of high-quality traits and the screening methods of stress-resistant resources. The study found that the global fresh corn germplasm resources show rich diversity in quality (such as sweetness and stickiness), resistance (such as drought resistance and salt tolerance) and nutritional traits (such as high zinc and high vitamin A). Modern technologies, including molecular marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology, have significantly improved the screening efficiency and breeding accuracy of germplasm resources. In addition, the commercial development of local germplasm resources and the promotion of regionally adaptable new varieties have provided successful cases for market demand-oriented breeding. Future research needs to be further deepened in terms of germplasm resource protection, evaluation standardization, technological innovation and international cooperation to achieve sustainable utilization and industrial application of resources. This study provides a comprehensive reference for the development and utilization of fresh corn germplasm resources and points out the direction for breeding work and agricultural development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaize Genomics and GeneticsSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207