Genetic Basis and Molecular Mechanisms of Trait Variation in the Domestication of Abalone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abalone is an important seafood shellfish, but it faces bottlenecks such as slow growth, poor stress resistance and limited reproduction efficiency during artificial domestication and breeding. This study reviews the rules of phenotypic trait variation during abalone domestication and deeply analyzes its genetic basis and molecular mechanism. In terms of traits such as growth, stress resistance and reproduction, the domesticated abalone population showed significant variations, and some excellent traits were strengthened by artificial selection. The application of modern molecular breeding technology has promoted the research on genetic improvement of abalone. Multi-omics such as genome sequencing, QTL localization, candidate gene screening, transcriptome and proteome have revealed important genes and signaling pathways that affect the trait of abalone. For example, IGF and mTOR are involved in regulating growth, NF-κB and HSP networks mediate immune resistance, and gonad development is regulated by specific genes. We also discuss the latest attempts and challenges of RNA interference and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in abalone functional gene verification. Through cases such as the cultivation of Japanese Ezo abalone (Haliotis discus hannai) disease-resistant strains, South African abalone (Haliotis midae) multi-generation breeding, and Hainan hybrid abalone multi-omics analysis, the direction of innovation in the abalone seed industry is expected. Research believes that integrating traditional breeding and molecular biology methods is expected to accelerate the genetic improvement of abalone, cultivate new varieties with fast growth and strong resistance to stress, and promote the sustainable development of abalone breeding industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".