MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413264543 · doi:10.7202/1118885ar

Émergence des sciences de la formation à l’université de Tours

2025· article· fr· W4413264543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhronesis · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyMerge (version control)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir de quatre incontournables à prendre en compte en formation des adultes, identifiés par Jean-Pierre Boutinet (2007), l’article commence par situer la construction des sciences de la formation dans un mouvement de transition paradigmatique. Avec cette référence modélisée, il opère ensuite un survol historique de l’émergence des sciences de la formation au laboratoire (1980) puis département des sciences de l’éducation et de la formation de l’Université de Tours. La problématique temporelle d’alternances intégratives entre formations expérientielle et formelle, par soi, avec les autres et les choses s’est imposée progressivement en plusieurs étapes et sous de multiples formes. Finalement émerge un vert paradigme d’auto-socio-éco-formation existentielle avec ses différentes dimensions axiologiques, épistémo-méthodologiques, stratégiques et ingénieriques à développer par rythmes appropriés pour vraiment vivre en existant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it