MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413269682 · doi:10.3138/tric-2025-0003

Ouvrir le dialogue à tous égards : Entrevue avec Natalie Labossière et Geneviève Doyon

2025· article· fr· W4413269682 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jeffrey Klassen, Jérôme Melançon, Natalie Labossière

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsYukon UniversityUniversity of ReginaNordion (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette entrevue croisée rassemble deux femmes de théâtre et marionnettistes : Nathalie Labossière, fondatrice de la compagnie Flammèche théâtre et consultante en éducation d’origine manitobaine vivant aux Territoires du Nord-Ouest, et Geneviève Doyon, animatrice de la compagnie Open Pit Theatre et archiviste. Cette dernière a vécu au Vénézuéla, aux Pays-Bas et en Belgique et se trouve désormais au Yukon. Nathalie Labossière et Geneviève Doyon détaillent la situation du théâtre francophone dans les territoires, à l’encontre des idées reçues et de l’imaginaire du Nord. Il est également question dans ce texte des relations avec les Premiers Peuples et de la décolonisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0380.029
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207