Dental treatment approaches under general anesthesia in children with cancer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate dental treatment approaches under general anesthesia in children with cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: DMF-T values of existing decay, missing and filled teeth of 68 pediatric patients receiving active cancer treatment were recorded. Systemic and physical examinations of patients were performed by a paediatrician. İntraoral and extraoral examinations of children were performed by pediatric dentists. The dental treatment plan encompasses the child's individualized oral health needs. Dental procedures are generally performed in the controlled environment of a hospital operating room under general anaesthesia. Analyzes were made with SPSS 25.0 package program. RESULTS: The study determined that the average age was 6.47±2.93. In this study, extraction-focused treatments were used instead of restorative (r=0.346, p=0.01) and endodontic treatments (r=0.274, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the development of restorative and endodontic treatments under general anaesthesia, even pediatric crown applications, radical decisions must be made to control the medical condition of patients with childhood cancers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it