A feedforward mechanism for human-like contour integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep neural network models provide a powerful experimental platform for exploring core mechanisms underlying human visual perception, such as perceptual grouping and contour integration-the process of linking local edge elements to arrive at a unified perceptual representation of a complete contour. Here, we demonstrate that feedforward convolutional neural networks (CNNs) fine-tuned on contour detection show this human-like capacity, but without relying on mechanisms proposed in prior work, such as lateral connections, recurrence, or top-down feedback. We identified two key properties needed for ImageNet pre-trained, feed-forward models to yield human-like contour integration: first, progressively increasing receptive field structure served as a critical architectural motif to support this capacity; and second, biased fine-tuning for contour-detection specifically for gradual curves (~20 degrees) resulted in human-like sensitivity to curvature. We further demonstrate that fine-tuning ImageNet pretrained models uncovers other hidden human-like capacities in feed-forward networks, including uncrowding (reduced interference from distractors as the number of distractors increases), which is considered a signature of human perceptual grouping. Thus, taken together these results provide a computational existence proof that purely feedforward hierarchical computations are capable of implementing gestalt "good continuation" and perceptual organization needed for human-like contour-integration and uncrowding. More broadly, these results raise the possibility that in human vision, later stages of processing play a more prominent role in perceptual-organization than implied by theories focused on recurrence and early lateral connections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".