MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413279726 · doi:10.52294/001c.142427

Proceedings of the OHBM Open Science Room 2024

2025· article· en· W4413279726 on OpenAlexafffund
Selma Lugtmeijer, Ju‐Chi Yu, Xiang-Zhen Kong, Pierre Bellec, Janine Bijsterbosch, Elizabeth DuPré, Oscar Estéban, Ibrahima Faye, Seok‐Jun Hong, Hu Chuan-Peng, Shella Keilholz, Chun‐Chia Kung, Daniel S. Margulies, Cyril Pernet, Franco Pestilli, Jean‐Baptiste Poline, Pradeep Reddy Raamana, Francesco Santini, Won Mok Shim, Paul M. Thompson, Chao‐Gan Yan, Niall W. Duncan, Nikhil Bhagwat, P. Mickle Fox, Ana E. Van Gulick, David N. Kennedy, Gorana Pobric, Neda Sadeghi, Nicholas E. Souter, Sandeep Panta, Isabelle F. van der Velpen, Tonya White, Sina Mansour L., Qing Wang, Povilas Karvelis, Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld, Yufang Yang, Hong Ji Kim, Nur Shahidatul Nabila Ibrahim, Stefano Moia, Wei Zhang, Rose-Marie Kouwenhoven, T. Lee, Hurshitha Vasudevan, Yuping Yang, Subapriya Suppiah, Y. T. Lee, Nils Muhlert

Bibliographic record

VenueAperture Neuro · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute of Mental HealthMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science and Technology CouncilMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaInstitute for Basic ScienceNovo NordiskNational Research Foundation of KoreaAcademia SinicaNovo Nordisk FondenNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGuarantors of BrainNational Science FoundationZhejiang UniversityNational Research FoundationCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthWashington University in St. Louis
KeywordsEngineering physicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Organisation for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) Open Science Room (OSR) is one of two principal events coordinated by the Open Science Special Interest Group (OSSIG). While the OHBM Brainhack occurs before the main OHBM conference, the OSR runs concurrently with the main program, offering a varied schedule parallel to other sessions. The OSR focuses on the opportunities, advancements, and challenges presented by open science to the neuroscience community. Sessions in the OSR emphasize interactive discussions aimed at advancing neuroscience research through open science practices. This report summarizes the events that took place in the OSR during the OHBM conference in June 2024, in Seoul, Korea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1940.054

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAperture NeuroSame topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207