Characterizing Post-Mortem Brain Molecular Taxonomy of Cognitive Resilience and Translating it to Living Humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here, we define cognitive resilience as slower or faster cognitive decline after we regress out the effects of common brain neuropathologies. Its understanding could provide important insights into the biology underlying cognitive health, enabling the development of more effective strategies to prevent cognitive decline and dementia. However, this requires the development of a practical method to quantify resilience and measure it in living individuals, as well as identifying heterogenous pathways associated with resilience in different individuals. Here, we approach this problem by using a data-driven framework to quantify and characterize molecular signatures underlying cognitive resilience. Using multimodal contrastive trajectory inference (mcTI) on bulk RNA sequencing and tandem mass tag (TMT) proteomic data from 898 post-mortem brain samples from the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), we derived individual-level molecular pseudotime values reflecting the molecular path from high to low resilience across individuals. Additionally, we identified two distinct molecular subtypes of resilience, each characterized by unique transcriptomic and proteomic signatures, and differing associations with several phenotypes. To translate our brain-derived pseudotime and subtypes to living individuals, we developed prediction models with paired genetics, ante-mortem blood omics, clinical, psychosocial, imaging and device data from the same individuals, demonstrating the potential to predict brain molecular resilience profiles in living persons. Our findings establish a framework for quantifying resilience based on multi-level molecular signatures, identify molecularly distinct resilience subtypes, and demonstrate the feasibility of translating brain-derived molecular profiles to living individuals-laying the groundwork for the development of targeted resilience-promoting interventions in cognitive aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".