MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413283447 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.13.670199

Obesogenic diet alters decidual differentiation and cell-cell communication in the mouse uterus

2025· preprint· en· W4413283447 on OpenAlexafffund
Burak Koksal, Christian J. Bellissimo, Patrycja A. Jazwiec, Deborah M. Sloboda, Alexander G. Beristain

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDecidual cellsUterusCell biologyCellBiologyEndocrinologyPregnancyPlacentaGeneticsFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Maternal obesity is associated with increased risk of infertility, implantation failure, miscarriage, and other pregnancy complications. While prior studies have linked obesity to uterine dysfunction and impaired endometrial biology, how obesity alters the cellular and molecular landscape of the early pregnant endometrium remains poorly understood. Here, we perform single-cell RNA sequencing of embryonic day 5.5 uterus from control and obesogenic mice to generate a cellular atlas of the early decidualizing endometrium. We identify obesity-associated transcriptional changes across multiple Endometrial Stromal Cell (ESC) states and innate immune populations, including uterine natural killer cells and macrophages. Computational modeling reveals that maternal obesity disrupts distinct routes of ESC differentiation during decidualization and leads to shifts in ESC-derived cues known to impact innate immune responses. These findings provide a comprehensive single-cell resource of the post-implantation mouse endometrium while simultaneously generating critical insight into how maternal obesity reprograms the maternal-fetal interface in early pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→