MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413284976 · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyaf052.274

431. USING THE LIVE RAT STRESS PARADIGM TO INVESTIGATE APPROACH-AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOUR RELEVANT TO PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS

2025· article· en· W4413284976 on OpenAlexaff
John P. Iredale, Tamás Füzesi, Jatinder Bains, CV Dayas, Elizabeth Campbell, Evie Manning

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPsychiatryStress (linguistics)Clinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chronic stress is a well-known antecedent to the development of mental health disorders, such as depression. Corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVNCRH) are known to play a key role in the neuroendocrine response to stress. However, we, and others, have recently shown that the PVNCRH neurons have non-neuroendocrine (synaptic) actions that directly and rapidly alter behaviour, resulting in lasting changes to stress coping and motivation. The contribution of the neural actions of the PVNCRH neurons to disorders such as depression, and how subpopulations of PVNCRH neurons may contribute to depression symptoms such as altered motivation, remains to be determined. Aims & Objectives Establish the live rat stress paradigm to assess changes in motivational conflict behaviours while undertaking neural recordings. Method To investigate the response of PVNCRH neurons, we used double transgenic CRH-cre x GCaMP6f mice to drive selective expression of the calcium indicator GCaMP6f in PVNCRH neurons. GRIN lens were implanted above the PVN, and miniature microscopes (Inscopix) were used to record the activity of individual PVNCRH neurons. To examine approach-avoidance behaviour under motivational conflict and associated neural activity, the live rat stress paradigm was utilised while undertaking both PVNCRH neural recording and video recording. Testing conditions were hungry (16 hours fasting) or sated mice and exposure to live rat or 3D-printed control. Testing was undertaken in a controlled setting whereby an arena was divided into mouse (40x40cm) and rat (20x40cm) areas, separated by a transparent, perforated wall. Mice could access sugar pellets adjacent to the perforated wall and the rat side of the area (approach behaviour) or retreat to a safe "hide" zone away from the perforated wall (avoidance behaviour). Results Creating a lens tract with a 29G needle prior to slow lens implantation limited tissue compression and facilitated deep hypothalamic imaging, with up to 25 neurons simultaneously recorded in individual animals. Results indicated the rat exposed fasted animals showed higher approach behaviour, with increased time spent in the feeding zone (subsequently near the live rat) compared to sated animals (41.4%±11.0 vs. 25.7%±14.4) and consumed significantly more pellets (35.0±9.0 vs. 8.0±4.0). Comparatively, fasted animals exposed to the live rat spent less time in the feeding zone than those exposed to the 3D-printed control (41.4%±10.97 vs. 86.9%±7.6) and spent more time avoiding in the hide zone than those exposed to the 3D-printed control (23.7%±11.7 vs. 2.5%±2.5). These results indicate different satiety states motivate approach behaviour towards the live rat as expected. Discussion & Conclusions This work established the use of the live rat stress paradigm as a means of investigating altered approach-avoidance behaviour in models of neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression. Ongoing analysis of neural activity is being used to evaluate how the activity of individual PVNCRH neurons is modulated during approach-avoidance behaviours by satiety state. Future studies will aim to use the recording and testing approaches trialled here in combination with a model of depression, to investigate potential role of the PVNCRH neurons in altered motivation and approach-avoidance behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207