MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413288527 · doi:10.1002/hbm.70319

Predicting Real‐Life Cognitive Scores From Functional Connectivity

2025· article· en· W4413288527 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Maya Kadushin, Asaf Madar, Niv Tik, Michal Bernstein‐Eliav, Ido Tavor

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Brain Mapping · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv UniversityTangled Art + DisabilityTel Aviv University
KeywordsCognitionCognitive psychologyFunctional magnetic resonance imagingPsychologyConnectomeHuman Connectome ProjectFunctional connectivityArtificial intelligenceMachine learningComputer scienceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decade, functional connectivity patterns, derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have been widely used to predict various cognitive traits. However, most studies have focused on measures assessed under controlled laboratory conditions, which may not fully reflect the complexity of the traits in real-world environments. In this study, we investigated connectome-based predictions of cognitive performance in ecologically valid, real-world settings. Participants (n = 194) performed the Psychometric Entrance Test, a standardized exam used for admission to higher education institutions in Israel and a strong predictor of undergraduate academic success. Using functional connectivity patterns, we significantly predicted overall test performance, as well as its three cognitive-specific domains: quantitative reasoning, verbal reasoning, and proficiency in a foreign language. Significant predictions were consistent across four different prediction approaches, demonstrating the robustness of the relations between functional connectivity and cognition. Additionally, we examined which connectivity features mostly contributed to predictions, analyzing both edge- and node-level contributions. We found that different cognitive abilities (i.e., quantitative skills vs. language-related skills) were primarily predicted by unique connectivity patterns. Yet, predictive features were more similar for scores that were more strongly correlated at the behavioral level. Last, we implemented a transfer learning approach in which the predicted cognitive-specific scores were used as features for prediction of the global score, resulting in an improved prediction compared to that derived directly from functional connectivity. Overall, our results demonstrate that the functional connectome captures real-world variability in both global and domain-specific cognitive abilities, emphasizing its potential to serve as an objective marker of real-world cognitive performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Brain MappingSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207