MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413289927 · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2025.1794

Audiovisual integration in infant language acquisition: Different patterns in typically developing infants and those at elevated risk for autism spectrum disorder

2025· article· en· W4413289927 on OpenAlexaff
Linlin Yan, Shaoying Liu, Naiqi G. Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Psychological Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMultisensory perception and integration
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderAutismPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyTypically developingAudiologyLanguage acquisitionCognitive psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

摘要: 多模态感知机制对婴儿期语言习得至关重要, 其中视听整合在典型发育婴儿的语言能力发展中起着关键作用。相比之下, 高风险自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)婴儿在此整合过程中常面临挑战。典型的言语感知发展轨迹强调面部特征加工的重要性——对眼部与嘴部区域的注意能促进语言学习。实证研究表明, 4.5月龄的婴儿已具备视听整合能力, 这种能力可有效预测后期语言发展水平。而高风险ASD婴儿则表现出社会性注意减少和视听整合功能受损, 此类缺陷可能破坏常规语言习得路径。因此, 早期干预策略应优先采用基于生物学的感觉引导方法, 重点增强多感官整合能力, 而非仅针对注意行为进行训练。理解这些机制不仅能深化对典型语言发展的认知, 更能为制定早期干预方案提供实证基础, 从而支持高风险ASD群体的语言习得。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Psychological ScienceSame topicMultisensory perception and integrationFrench-language works237,207