MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413291088 · doi:10.2316/j.2025.203-0591

EFFICIENCY OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER GENERATION SYSTEM BASED ON REINFORCEMENT LEARNING AND ADAPTIVE MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL, 1-10.

2025· article· en· W4413291088 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhichao Zhang, Qihang Liu, C.X. Wang, Yujie Zong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Power and Energy Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningPhotovoltaic systemModel predictive controlReinforcementPredictive powerComputer scienceElectric power systemControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Power (physics)Control engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photovoltaic power generation is an important component of achieving sustainable development of renewable energy, and improving the efficiency of photovoltaic power generation is crucial.This paper proposes an efficiency optimisation method for photovoltaic power generation systems based on reinforcement learning and adaptive model predictive control (MPC).The method combines reinforcement learning algorithms with MPC to optimise the control parameters through reinforcement learning algorithms, achieving dynamic adaptive control of photovoltaic power generation systems.Firstly, the reinforcement learning algorithms and interactive learning optimal control strategies are adopted in order to increase adaptability and robustness in different environmental conditions.Secondly, the rolling optimisation of predictive control is achieved to increase efficiency and stability in photovoltaic power generation systems.In addition, the adaptive control mechanism dynamically adjusts control parameters by monitoring environmental parameters and system status in realtime, ensuring that the system maintains optimal performance under various operating conditions.Finally, experimental results demonstrate that the proposed optimisation algorithm not only significantly increases accuracy and control efficiency of a system but also significantly boosts stability and reliability in complex environments for greater application potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Power and Energy SystemsSame topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207