Runoff Prediction in the Xiangxi River Basin Under Climate Change: The Application of the HBV-XGBoost Coupled Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Global warming has made water resources more uneven in space and time, making water management harder. This study used the HBV-XGBoost model to see how climate change affects runoff in the Xiangxi River Basin. The HBV model simulated water processes, and XGBoost improved predictions by handling complex relationships. This study used the SDSM to create climate data for 2025–2100 and looked at runoff trends under different emission scenarios. The HBV-XGBoost model performed better than the HBV model in simulating runoff. Future predictions showed big differences in runoff trends under various SSP scenarios in the 2040s and 2080s. For example, under SSP585, the ACCESS-CM2 model projected a May runoff increase from 1527.52 m3/s to 2344.42 m3/s by the 2080s, and ACCESS-ESM1-5 projected an increase from 1462.11 m3/s to 2889.58 m3/s. All GCMs predicted a large rise in annual runoff under SSP585 by the 2080s, with FGOALS-g3 showing the highest growth rate of 76.54%. The model accurately simulated runoff changes and provided useful insights for adapting water management to climate change. However, this study has limitations, including uncertainties in machine learning models, potential input data biases, and varying applicability under different conditions. Future work should explore more climate models and downscaling methods to improve accuracy and consider local policies to better address climate impacts on water resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".