The Rise of Posthumanism in Marine Ecotourism: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the intellectual landscape of posthumanism in the context of ecotourism and sustainability through a bibliometric and keyword co-occurrence analysis using VOSviewer. By mapping the collaboration networks of authors and countries, and visualizing the co-occurrence of key terms, the research identifies the most influential contributors, emerging thematic clusters, and interdisciplinary linkages within the field. The study reveals that authors from the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia are central to scholarly collaborations, while thematic clusters show an integration of critical theory, environmental justice, and sustainable development. Keyword analysis highlights the growing traction of philosophical and ecological terms that emphasize more-than-human perspectives in tourism research. These findings underscore the importance of rethinking traditional tourism paradigms and advocate for a more inclusive, relational, and sustainable approach to ecotourism grounded in posthumanist ethics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.027 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it