MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hydro-physical and carbon properties of peat across peatland types and climate zones

2025· article· en· W4413297600 on OpenAlex
Ji Qi, Sophia Weigt, Miaorun Wang, Fereidoun Rezanezhad, William L. Quinton, Dominik Žák, Sate Ahmad, Lingxiao Wang, Ying Zhao, Bernd Lennartz, Haojie Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersResearch IrelandDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsPeatEnvironmental scienceCarbon fibersBogPhysical geographyHydrology (agriculture)Earth scienceGeologyGeographyArchaeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydro-physical properties of peat play a pivotal role in regulating the water, nutrient, and carbon cycles of peatland ecosystems. However, our understanding of peat hydraulic properties remains limited, especially at a global perspective. In this study, we compiled a comprehensive global database of the peat physical, hydraulic, and chemical properties, including bulk density (BD), porosity, macroporosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K s ), carbon content, and carbon density, encompassing tropical peatlands, boreal and temperate fens and bogs, and permafrost regions. Our primary objective was to examine how these properties varied along a BD gradient across peatland types and climate zones. The results revealed a robust linear relationship between carbon density and BD for various peatland types with carbon content exceeding 35 % ( R 2 > 0.93, p < 0.001). The carbon density of tropical peatlands was more sensitive to changes in BD than that of boreal and temperate peatlands. Total porosity was found to decrease linearly as BD increased, while macroporosity followed a power-law relationship with BD. These trends were consistent across all peatland types, underscoring a strong and reliable association between BD and both total porosity and macroporosity. Additionally, K s exhibited a general decline with increasing BD, with the relationship characterized by log–log functions that varied among peatland types and climate zones. These findings indicated that hydraulic functions of peat (e.g., carbon density, K s ) were significantly influenced by the peat-forming vegetation such as woody plants, Sphagnum , sedges, and the prevailing climatic conditions of the peatland. This study demonstrated that the key peat hydro-physical–chemical parameters—including carbon density, porosity, macroporosity, and K s could be reliably estimated using the BD, with relatively high coefficients of determination ( R 2 > 0.4), highlighting the critical importance of determining BD as a proxy for estimating other hydro-physical properties of peat when direct measurements are unavailable and potentially serving as reliable tools for estimating the carbon stock of peatlands across peatland types and climate zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it