Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article sheds light on the reality of Daries[1], a migrant trans individual in Spain, while they navigate new laws, policies, and programs meant to aid the trans community as a whole. Similar to how indigenous gender studies distinguish between indigenous experiences with gender in different colonized countries, it is important to distinguish the experiences of trans individuals who are migrating from Latin America to Europe. By sharing Daries’ story, this article demonstrates the importance of capturing the heterogeneity that exists among trans communities, especially as it relates to their experiences as migrants abroad. Spain has recently passed the ley trans, a law which asserts that all trans identities must be recognized and protected. However, the lived experiences of migrant trans individuals are not fully integrated within the ley trans because their stories are not being as extensively shared as those of non-migrant individuals. When trying to understand the experiences of migrant trans individuals, the politics of recognition reveal the limitations faced by trans migrants in having their identities fully recognized. For migrant trans individuals, their recognition from the state is based on their proximity to binary gender identities and citizenship status. Hence, I describe: (1) the exclusions that currently exist among migrants who are trans and living in Spain; (2) the lack of recognition and integration within the new national trans policies being implemented in Spain; and (3) existing citizenship policies that limit a migrant’s individual trajectory when they settle in a host country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".