MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413303184 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1595906

Molecular insights into postharvest seed coat darkening in common beans: a look beyond the P gene

2025· article· en· W4413303184 on OpenAlexafffund
Nishat S. Islam, Sangeeta Dhaubhadel

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Gene Expression Analysis
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern University
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPostharvestCoatBiologyGeneGeneticsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many market classes of common beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) have a significant reduction in crop value due to the postharvest darkening of the seed coat. Seed coat darkening is caused by an elevated accumulation and oxidation of proanthocyanidins (PAs). In common bean, the major color gene P encodes for a bHLH protein with its P sd allele controlling the postharvest slow darkening seed coat trait. In the present investigation, we determined that P/P sd , PvMYB3A, and PvWD9 are the essential components that form a protein complex and regulate PA biosynthesis in pinto beans. P does not bind with the PA biosynthetic gene Anthocyanin Reductase ( PvANR ) promoter but regulates its expression by interacting with PvMYB3A, which directly binds to the PvANR promoter. PvWD9 is an essential member of the core protein complex, which requires one or more additional plant components in order to interact with its partner proteins P and PvMYB3A and create a functioning complex. The P sd isoform affects the accumulation of PA by functioning in a similar manner to its isoform P, albeit at a lower efficiency. Understanding the regulation of PA biosynthesis in common beans helps to explain variances in seed coat color and issues associated with darkening after harvest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Gene Expression AnalysisFrench-language works237,207