Erratum for “Development Length of Small-Diameter Basalt FRP Bars in Normal- and High-Strength Concrete”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors found typographical errors in the original paper that require correction in Tables 1 and 2 and Fig. 5.In Table 1, the beam with 55 MPa design concrete strength, 6 mm d b , and 40.7 L e × d b should read a beam size of B2.In Table 2, the bar axial stresses for Specimen IDs 75-8-44, 75-8-100, 75-8-144, 75-8-178, and 75-8-233 should read 567, 780, 817, 857, and 867 MPa, respectively.In Fig. 5, the y-axis moment values were incorrect.Corrected versions of these tables and this figure are provided herein.Additionally, measured values for the shear span and midspan moment arm were used for the analysis in the paper rather than the nominal values shown in Fig. 3 of the paper.These values are added to Table 2 herein for clarity.The authors regret the errors and note that the errors do not affect the rest of the manuscript; all findings and conclusions presented in the paper remain the same.To preserve the published version of record, these details are corrected only in this erratum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".