MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413304836 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24111-2

Preschoolers in severely food insecure Guatemalan Mayan households consume a monotonous grain-based diet

2025· article· en· W4413304836 on OpenAlexafffund
Michele Monroy-Valle, Maira Ruano Estrada, María del Carmen Caamaño, Karla Cordón‐Arrivillaga, Ginny Lane, Hassanali Vatanparast

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesFondation Rideau HallUniversidad de San Carlos de GuatemalaUniversidad del Valle
KeywordsEnvironmental healthMedicineMalnutritionPublic healthBiostatisticsPovertyCross-sectional studyGerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Stunting, also known as growth retardation, is a prominent health challenge for Mayan children, stemming from the complex interaction of malnutrition, inflammation, limited healthcare access, poverty, and food insecurity. Diet plays a key role in early childhood growth. A monotonous diet may lack essential nutrients, potentially affecting growth and developmental trajectories. Our objective was to explore the dietary patterns of Guatemalan Mayan children, comparing stunted children to those with typical growth. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 155 Mayan children aged 2 to 5 years in Guatemala. Dietary intake was assessed using three 24-hour recalls. A questionnaire assessed WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) service availability and household food insecurity via the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). Additionally, we measured weight, height, age, body composition, and recent common childhood communicable diseases (CCCD). The dietary data was analyzed based on two approaches: The nutrient approach yields the prevalence of inadequacy, and A-posteriori approach using K-means cluster analysis informed about the dietary pattern of the sample, including types of foods, and their energy contribution to the diet. RESULTS: Stunting affected 53.5% of the children, and nearly half of the children (49.7%) had experienced one or more recent CCCD. The majority resided in food-insecure households (81.9%), with more than half located in rural areas (61.6%). They had a low intake of omega-3, omega-6 fatty calcium and choline. We found two distinct dietary patterns: the grain-based diet, represented by high intakes of cereal-based drinks and corn-based meals. The second was a dairy, poultry, and corn dietary pattern; distinguished by higher consumption of dairy products and poultry. CONCLUSION: Significantly more children living in severely food insecure households consumed a grain-based dietary pattern. The stunted children on the grain-based diet consumed more calories from grain-based drinks than any other food group. Beyond dietary monotony and poor nutritional quality, additional factors likely contribute to the high stunting rate, requiring further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→