MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413310337 · doi:10.52843/cassyni.phvy5h

Exploratory Clinical Pharmacology for Drug Repurposing: Feasible Approaches and Insights

2025· preprint· en· W4413310337 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal testing and alternatives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepurposingDrug repositioningDrugClinical pharmacologyPharmacologyComputer scienceMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Join us for webinar from Prof. Ahmed El-Yazbi, Professor of Pharmacology and Therapeutics at Alamein International University, and Adjunct Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry at Texas Tech University on the repurposing of drugs in clinical pharmacology. Prof. El-Yazbi graduated in 2001 from the Faculty of Pharmacy in Alexandria University, with a BPharm degree. He received his PhD in Pharmacology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Alberta in 2008. He was then awarded two fellowships from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions to conduct a research program studying the regulation of cerebral blood flow at the Hotchkiss Brain Institute at the University of Calgary. Dr. El-Yazbi has two board certifications in Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy from Canadian and American Boards. Dr. El-Yazbi leads a large research group in Egypt and collaborates with multiple research partners nationally and internationally. His research uses multiple tools ranging from molecular studies to machine learning to focus on cardiometabolic pathophysiology, producing over 100 research articles and mentoring 25 post-graduate students. His translational research program investigates the mechanisms of cardiovascular dysfunction in metabolic disease and identifies targets for novel therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.591
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.085 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnimal testing and alternativesFrench-language works237,207