Trajectoire et vécu des aidantes et aidants lors de la crise sanitaire de la covid-19 en France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En France, la crise sanitaire du Covid-19 et le confinement généralisé de la population ont exercé une forte tension sur l’activité d’aide des proches de personnes âgées en perte d’autonomie et de personnes en situation de handicap. Les restrictions de déplacement et la fermeture de nombreux services sanitaires et médico-sociaux ont renforcé l’isolement des aidantes et des aidants qui accompagnent leur proche à domicile. Entre mars et mai 2020, une enquête par questionnaire a été menée en ligne auprès des adhérents des associations membres du Collectif Inter-Associatif des Aidants Familiaux (1032 réponses). L’article analyse les différents vécus de l’aide pendant le confinement en comparant les situations selon le genre de l’aidant et le lien avec la personne aidée. Il interroge également la relation entre la trajectoire d’aide et le vécu d’une crise aussi aigüe que la pandémie de Covid-19.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".