MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after cementless minimally invasive extendable endoprosthesis replacement in skeletally immature patients with bone sarcomas at the lower limb

2025· article· en· W4413311234 on OpenAlex
Yusuke Tsuda, Yoshihiro Nishida, Akio Sakamoto, Koichi Ogura, Tomohiro Fujiwara, Tetsuya Sekita, Hirotaka Kawano, Hiroshi Kobayashi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBone & Joint Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsMedicineTerm (time)OsteosarcomaSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: Extendable endoprostheses are utilized to reconstruct segmental defects following resection of bone sarcomas in skeletally immature children. However, there remains a paucity of data regarding long-term functional and quality of life outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study and reviewed 45 children who underwent cementless minimally invasive extendable endoprosthetic replacement. Anatomical sites included the distal femur (n = 29), proximal femur (n = 4), proximal tibia (n = 11), and total femur (n = 1). The mean follow-up period was 12 years. The mean age at extendable endoprosthetic replacement was ten years (5 to 15). Most patients (96%, 43/45) had reached skeletal maturity at the final follow-up. Results: The ten-year endoprosthetic failure-free survival rate was 60%. Of the 45 patients, 25 (56%) had 42 complications which were frequently related to structural failure (45%, 19/42), with extension mechanism jamming being the most common (n = 7, 17%). Excluding lengthening procedures, 20 patients (44%) underwent additional surgery with a mean of two surgeries per patient. The mean limb-length discrepancy at the final follow-up was 2.3 cm. Limb salvage was achieved in 44 (98%) patients. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) were 78%, 92%, and 92% at the last follow-up, respectively. Multiple additional surgeries (≥ 2 times) for complications were associated with worse MSTS scores compared with those without multiple additional surgeries (p = 0.009). Moreover, limb-length discrepancy > 3 cm showed significantly worse MSTS scores compared with those ≤ 3 cm (p = 0.019). Conclusion: Extendable endoprostheses were associated with a high complication rate and need for additional surgeries over time, especially for structural-related complications. Despite this, successful limb salvage with reasonable function/quality of life and small limb-length discrepancy were achievable in the long term. Patients' function in the long term depended on the experience of postoperative complications and limb-length discrepancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it