Multidisciplinary perspectives in exercise oncology across the translational research continuum
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exercise oncology is a multidisciplinary field that encompasses research across the translational continuum. Some of the major disciplines contributing to the field include biology, immunology, physiology, psychology, behavioral science, epidemiology, and clinical oncology. Here, we provide a brief overview of the field under the headings of preclinical studies, observational studies, interventional outcome studies, interventional behavioral studies, dissemination and implementation studies, and childhood cancer studies. Preclinical studies have generally demonstrated that exercise can reduce tumor growth, primarily by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Observational studies have generally demonstrated that higher postdiagnosis exercise is associated with lower rates of mortality, however, most studies have not considered the combination and sequencing of exercise with other cancer treatments. Interventional outcome studies have consistently demonstrated strong evidence that aerobic and/or resistance exercise have beneficial effects on fatigue, anxiety, depression, physical functioning, and quality of life in adult patients treated with curative intent. Childhood cancer studies have demonstrated beneficial effects on cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength; however, the quality of evidence is often low. Interventional behavioral studies have identified multiple effective exercise behavior change strategies, yet the evidence is limited by a lack of diversity, minimal attention to social determinants, and insufficient knowledge to tailor interventions. Dissemination and implementation studies are occurring globally, yet an evidence base identifying the most cost-effective, equitable, and sustainable strategies is limited. Notwithstanding substantial limitations and remaining research gaps, multidisciplinary exercise oncology research across the translational continuum has provided cancer patients with evidence-based recommendations for improving quality of life and possibly survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it