MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Metamaterial-Inspired Microwave Sensor for Enhanced Liquid Characterization

2025· article· en· W4413321360 on OpenAlexaff
Amirhossein Yazdanicherati, Mehri Ziaee Bideskan, Zahra Abbasi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialMicrowaveCharacterization (materials science)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsMicrowave imagingComputer scienceNanotechnologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid characterization is crucial in various fields, including biomedical and agricultural applications. This study introduces a novel microwave sensing setup that integrates an ultra-wideband antenna with a Two-layer, metamaterialinspired passive tag for precise liquid analysis. This design effectively detects small variations in the dielectric properties of materials, focusing on real-time water quality monitoring for precision agriculture. An aqueous solution of ammonium chloride ($\text{NH}_{4} \text{Cl}$) at concentrations ranging from 10 ppm to 6000 ppm was investigated using the proposed sensor. The sensor demonstrated an$\mathbf{8. 1 5 ~ d B}$amplitude shift at its resonance frequency as$\text{NH}_{4} \text{Cl}$concentration varied from$\mathbf{0}$to$\mathbf{6 0 0 0}$ppm, highlighting its sensitivity and reliability. This innovative sensing system represents a significant advancement in liquid characterization technology, providing a real-time solution for monitoring changes in liquids. Its application in agricultural fertilizer management can help mitigate challenges associated with liquid characterization, ensuring improved efficiency and environmental sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→