MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design and Operations of ArcticSat, a Passive Radiometer Cubesat for Northern Canada

2025· article· en· W4413321724 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Andrew S. Bowman, Dustin Isleifson, Philip Ferguson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsCubeSatRadiometerRemote sensingComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyEngineeringAerospace engineeringSatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic communities of Canada have generational knowledge of sea ice passed down to ensure their safety. However, climate change has significantly impacted the livelihood of these communities, who rely on sea ice for travel, hunting, and fishing. While other satellite missions have been collecting sea ice data, ArcticSat strives to provide direct and fast data access for northern communities, particularly through co-development with the community of Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut, Canada. This paper describes the design specifications and Concept of Operations (ConOps) for ArcticSat, a$10 ~\text{cm} \times 10 ~\text{cm} \times 30 \text{cm}$CubeSat carrying a passive radiometer in a polar orbit. ArcticSat will use a single reaction wheel to point the radiometer toward a ground target. The collected data will be downlinked to the C-CORE ground station in Inuvik, Northwest Territories. The mission's frequent passes over the ground station allow fast access to the sea ice data, which will be delivered to northern communities through SIKU, the Indigenous knowledge social network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207