Deciphering the RNA-based regulation mechanism of the phage-encoded AbiF system in Clostridioides difficile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile is the major cause of nosocomial infections associated with antibiotic therapy. The severity of C. difficile infections increased worldwide with the emergence of hypervirulent strains, including 027 ribotype epidemic strains. Many aspects of C. difficile adaptation strategies during pathogenesis remain poorly understood. This pathogen thrives in gut communities that are rich in microbes and phages. To regulate horizontal transfer of genetic material during its infection cycle, C. difficile relies on diverse mechanisms. More specifically, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas and Toxin-Antitoxin (TA) systems contribute to prophage maintenance, prevention of phage infection, and stress response. Abortive infection (Abi) systems can provide additional lines of anti-phage defense. RNAs have emerged as key components of these systems including CRISPR RNAs and antitoxin RNAs within type I and type III TA. We report here the identification of a new AbiF-like system within a prophage of the hypervirulent C. difficile strain R20291. It is associated with an Abi_2/AbiD/F protein family largely distributed in Bacillota and Pseudomonadota with structural links to ancestral Cas13 proteins at the origin of the RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas13 systems. We demonstrated toxic activity of the AbiFCd protein in C. difficile and in Escherichia coli and negative regulation of the abiFCd expression by an associated non-coding RNA RCd22. RCd22 contains two conserved abiF motifs and is active both in cis and in trans to neutralize the toxin by direct RNA-protein interaction, similar to RNA antitoxin in type III TA. A mass spectrometry interactomics analysis of protein fractions from MS2-Affinity Purification coupled with RNA sequencing (MAPS) revealed the AbiFCd protein among the most enriched RCd22 partners in C. difficile. Structural modeling of the RNA-protein complex and mutagenesis analysis revealed key positions on both protein and RNA partners for this interaction and toxic activity. In summary, these findings provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of interaction between bacteria and phages, which are pertinent to the advancement of phage therapy, genome editing, epidemiological surveillance, and the formulation of novel therapeutic approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".