Efficient Dynamic Emotion Recognition from Facial Expressions Using Statistical Spatio-Temporal Geometric Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automatic Facial Expression Recognition (AFER) is a key component of affective computing, enabling machines to recognize and interpret human emotions across various applications such as human–computer interaction, healthcare, entertainment, and social robotics. Dynamic AFER systems, which exploit image sequences, can capture the temporal evolution of facial expressions but often suffer from high computational costs, limiting their suitability for real-time use. In this paper, we propose an efficient dynamic AFER approach based on a novel spatio-temporal representation. Facial landmarks are extracted, and all possible Euclidean distances are computed to model the spatial structure. To capture temporal variations, three statistical metrics are applied to each distance sequence. A feature selection stage based on the Extremely Randomized Trees (ExtRa-Trees) algorithm is then performed to reduce dimensionality and enhance classification performance. Finally, the emotions are classified using a linear multi-class Support Vector Machine (SVM) and compared against the k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) method. The proposed approach is evaluated on three benchmark datasets: CK+, MUG, and MMI, achieving recognition rates of 94.65%, 93.98%, and 75.59%, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a strong balance between accuracy and computational efficiency, making it well-suited for real-time facial expression recognition applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".