MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413326017 · doi:10.3390/jrfm18080461

The Impact of Economic Freedom on Economic Growth in Western Balkan Countries

2025· article· en· W4413326017 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roberta Bajrami, Adelina Gashi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of risk and financial management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCorruption and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic freedomDevelopment economicsEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic systemMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although it is generally accepted that economic freedom stimulates economic growth, its effects in transitional economies are still up for debate. More empirical research is needed to examine the long-term effects of economic freedom on growth in the Western Balkans, a region characterised by uneven reform trajectories, fiscal pressures, and institutional fragility. This study examines the effects of seven fundamental factors on real GDP per capita growth (annual percentage change) in six Western Balkan nations between 2013 and 2023. These factors include property rights, government spending, government integrity, business freedom, monetary freedom, trade openness, and education spending. Importantly, in order to better capture macroeconomic constraints, it takes into account two fiscal burden indicators: the public debt and the government budget deficit. A triangulated analytical framework is used: Random Forest regression identifies non-linear patterns and ranks the importance of variables; Bayesian Vector Autoregression (VAR) models dynamic interactions and inertia; and the Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) handles endogeneity and reveals causal relationships. The GMM results show that while government integrity (β = −0.0820, p = 0.0206), government spending (β = −0.0066, p = 0.0312), and public debt (β = −0.0172, p = 0.0456) have negative effects on growth, property rights (β = 0.0367, p = 0.0208), monetary freedom (β = 0.0413, p = 0.0221), and the government budget deficit (β = 0.0498, p = 0.0371) have positive and significant effects on growth. Although the majority of economic freedom indicators are statistically insignificant, Bayesian VAR confirms strong growth persistence (GDP(−1) = 0.7169, SE = 0.0373). On the other hand, the Random Forest model identifies the most significant variables as property rights (3.72), public debt (5.88), business freedom (4.65), and government spending (IncNodePurity = 9.80). These results show that the growth effects of economic freedom depend on the context and are mediated by the state of the economy. Market liberalisation and legal certainty promote growth, but their advantages could be offset by inadequate budgetary restraint and difficulties with transitional governance. A hybrid policy approach, one that blends strategic market reforms with improved institutional quality, prudent debt management, and efficient public spending, is necessary for the region to achieve sustainable development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of risk and financial managementSame topicCorruption and Economic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207