MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413326238 · doi:10.2172/2569964

Expression of Interest: Rare Eta Decays with a TPC for Optical Photons

2019· report· eu· W4413326238 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Alexahin, M. Backfish, Jishnu Dey, Bogdan A. Dobrescu, E. Gianfelice-Wendt, Erwin Hahn, Roni Harnik, D. A. Jensen, John Johnstone, T. Kobilarcik, Andreas S. Kronfeld, K. Krempetz, M. May, A. Mazzacane, N. Mokhov, W. Pellico, A. Pla-Dalmau, V. Pronskikh, E. Ramberg, John Rauch, G. Sellberg, G. Tassotto, J.R. Comfort, F.V. Ignatov, C. Gatto, G. Blazey, M. Syphers, V. Zutshi, M. Pospelov, Stephanie Gardner, J. Shi, X. Yan, Cristina Siligardi, Silvia Barbi, Consuelo Mugoni, Maurizio Guida

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageeu
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersFermilab
KeywordsPhotonPhysicsParticle physicsNuclear physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The REDTOP experiment is primarily intended to look for new violations of basic symmetry principles and conservation laws in particle physics. Our main focus will be on very rare decays of the meson. From the Standard Model and other theories, such decays can provide distinct insights into the limits of conservation laws and open unique doors to new ones at branching ratio sensitivity levels typically below 10􀀀9. Notably, current experimental upper limits for decays are many orders of magnitude larger. The sensitivity goal of our experiment is expected to be better than 10􀀀10 for most decay modes, based on an estimated yield of more than 1012 mesons per year. Numerous opportunities for new physics Beyond the Standard Model will become available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Information and Cryptography→French-language works237,207→