MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413330028 · doi:10.17758/eares22.eap0725107

Artificial Intelligence in Education: Innovations and Challenges in India and Canada

2025· article· en· W4413330028 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education is revolutionizing teaching methodologies, learning experiences, and assessment strategies across the globe.Countries like India and Canada are leveraging AI to enhance student engagement, optimize instructional delivery, and support data-driven decisionmaking for educators.This paper explores the role of AI in education, focusing on innovations and challenges in both India and Canada.In India, AI-driven adaptive learning platforms such as BYJU'S and Embibe are personalizing education by analyzing student progress and offering customized content.AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants are being integrated into digital classrooms, enabling students in remote and underserved areas to access quality education.The Indian government's National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasizes the use of AI in education to foster inclusivity and skill development, ensuring that students are equipped for an AI-driven future.However, challenges such as the digital divide, infrastructural limitations, and concerns over data privacy remain significant barriers to widespread adoption.In Canada, AI is being utilized to create smart classrooms, automate assessments, and develop predictive analytics for student success.Institutions like the University of Toronto and McGill University are at the forefront of AI research in education, exploring innovative ways to enhance learning.AI-powered tutoring systems and language processing tools assist international students, while AI-driven administrative tools help optimize academic operations.Canada's strong regulatory framework ensures ethical AI implementation, but challenges such as maintaining the balance between AI and human-led pedagogy persist.Comparing India and Canada's approaches to AI in education offers valuable insights into global best practices.While AI presents transformative opportunities, its ethical implications and equitable access must be addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207