MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413332417 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.07.161

Hybrid CNN-LSTM-GRU with Attention for Human Activity Recognition

2025· article· en· W4413332417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionActivity recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human activity recognition (HAR) using smartphone inertial sensors plays a critical role in mobile health applications through the continuous, unobtrusive monitoring of daily activities. This study introduces a hybrid deep learning architecture combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for spatial feature extraction, Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) for capturing complex temporal dependencies and an attention mechanism to dynamically focus on informative time steps. We evaluated this model using the standardized DAGHAR benchmark, specifically on RealWorld waist data collected via smartphones. Our experiments demonstrated a strong average cross-validation accuracy which outperforms the other models as reported in the literature, thus highlighting the model’s potential for mobile health applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it