MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413332857 · doi:10.29313/bcsurp.v5i2.20396

Identifikasi Faktor yang Berpengaruh dalam Transformasi Nilai Lahan di SWK Gedebage

2025· article· en· W4413332857 on OpenAlexaff
Farras Nasywa Meisyifa, Nia Kurniasari

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Land Suitability Analysis
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The land transformation in the Sub-City Area (SWK) of Gedebage, as a new growth center of Bandung City, has triggered significant changes in land value. This study aims to identify and map the variables influencing land value transformation before and after development, using the Matrix of Cross Impact Multiplications Applied to Classification (MICMAC) method. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews with key stakeholders, and analyzed based on the influence and dependence levels among variables. The results indicate that variables such as the Availability of Green Open Space (KRTH) and Quality of Regional Infrastructure (KIW) are key factors in future land value shifts. The changing positions of variables between pre- and post-development phases highlight a complex systemic dynamic. These findings provide a foundation for formulating more adaptive and sustainable spatial policies for future development in the Gedebage area. Abstrak. Transformasi lahan di Sub Wilayah Kota (SWK) Gedebage sebagai pusat pertumbuhan baru Kota Bandung telah memicu perubahan signifikan terhadap nilai lahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi dan memetakan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi perubahan nilai lahan sebelum dan sesudah pengembangan, menggunakan metode Matrix of Cross Impact Multiplications Applied to Classification (MICMAC). Data diperoleh melalui kuesioner dan wawancara dengan aktor kunci serta dianalisis berdasarkan tingkat pengaruh dan ketergantungan antar faktor. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa faktor seperti Ketersediaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau (KRTH) dan Kualitas Infrastruktur Wilayah (KIW) menjadi faktor kunci dalam perubahan nilai lahan di masa depan. Pergeseran posisi faktor antara pra dan pasca pengembangan menandakan adanya dinamika sistem yang kompleks. Temuan ini memberikan dasar perumusan kebijakan spasial yang lebih adaptif dan berkelanjutan untuk pengembangan kawasan Gedebage ke depan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional PlanningSame topicSoil and Land Suitability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207