Bridges to treatment satisfaction: the roles of trauma, social support, race and ethnicity among perinatal women receiving behavioural activation therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High treatment satisfaction is related to improved treatment adherence and outcomes in psychotherapy research. Satisfaction with psychotherapy treatment among racially and ethnically diverse perinatal populations with post-traumatic stress (PTS) remains understudied. The aims of this study are to examine the relations between PTS symptoms, perceived social support, and race and ethnicity, and treatment satisfaction among perinatal women receiving behavioural activation (BA) psychotherapy. METHODS: This is a mixed-methods study of the Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) trial-a large, multi-site, non-inferiority trial for perinatal women with depressive and anxiety symptoms (NCT04153864). A two-sample t-test compared baseline PTS symptoms, social support, and treatment satisfaction between participants from white and racial and ethnic minority groups. Hierarchical multiple linear regression examined whether PTS symptoms, perceived social support, race and ethnicity predicted treatment satisfaction. Content analysis of open-ended responses explored facilitators and modifications for improving treatment satisfaction across PTS symptom severity and race and ethnicity. RESULTS: Of 1230 women, 1119 (90.98%) had ≥ 1 BA session. Compared to their white counterparts, baseline PTS symptom severity was higher (t(1087) = - 4.98; p < 0.001; 95% CI = - 2.23, - 0.97), and social support lower (t(1087) = 8.05; p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.43, 0.71) among racial and ethnic minority women. Lower baseline PTS symptom severity (β = - 0.009; 95% CI = - 0.016, - 0.002) and higher perceived social support (β = 0.042; 95% CI = 0.013, 0.072) were associated with higher post-treatment satisfaction across the sample. Descriptive analysis revealed no differences in treatment satisfaction across race and ethnicity; treatment satisfaction was higher for racial and ethnic minority women when social support was added to the regression model (β = 0.077; 95% CI = 0.005, 0.149). Content analysis (n = 807) revealed no differences by PTS symptoms severity or race and ethnicity across reported facilitators and modifications. BA as a treatment modality (n = 446, 55.27%) was a key facilitator; modifications included more sessions (n = 202, 25.03%). CONCLUSIONS: PTS symptom severity and social support predict treatment satisfaction among racially and ethnically diverse perinatal populations and should be considered when delivering psychotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04153864. Registered on November 6, 2019.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".