MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413339075 · doi:10.5817/cejcs2024-19-6

Symbols of Canadian identity : the iconography of plaid flannel shirts in Canadian popular culture

2024· article· en· W4413339075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. L. Kennedy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Central European journal of Canadian studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconographyIdentity (music)Media studiesPolitical scienceArtArt historySociologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I will examine the use of symbolism in the creation and maintenance of Canadian identity and culture, focusing on the development of one pervasive symbol of Canadian identity: the red plaid flannel shirt. This item of clothing has symbolized Canadian identity since long before Canada officially became a country in 1867, being a cultural icon of the Scottish immigrants who came to Canada during the 18th and 19th centuries. As an official uniform, the tartan of the Scottish soldiers who fought, and were defeated by, the English armies in the 18th century Jacobite Rebellions, became an emblem of independence and determination that was adapted and adopted as a symbol of personal freedom in early and modern Canadian literature and cultural life. Today, one of the hallmarks of Canadianness is the ability of Canadians to view themselves with a sense of humour, and so the red plaid flannel shirt has evolved into a symbol of gentle self-parody, a character trait that has achieved international recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0360.019
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Central European journal of Canadian studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207