MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413339102 · doi:10.5817/cejcs2024-19-7

Measure for measure : quantification in The Colony of Unrequited Dreams

2024· article· en· W4413339102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan J. Siggelakis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Central European journal of Canadian studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Computer scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes Wayne Johnston's novel The Colony of Unrequited Dreams in terms of the ways in which measurement, and mathematics more broadly, are incorporated into the autobiographical narratives within the text. The main character, the fiction fictionalized Joseph Smallwood who is based loosely on Newfoundland's first premier, often speaks of both numeric and nonnumeric measurements and calculations in his descriptions of instances of social and economic hierarchies, human frailty and intractable problems, both personal and political. As someone who intends greatness for himself and his country, Joe's life and career are followed as he attempts to both evaluate and remedy the social and economic conditions which have meant poverty and despair for his fellow Newfoundlanders, while at the same time fulfilling his personal dream of bringing the island colony into the Canadian Confederation – a dream he finally achieves in 1949. The use of mathematics to describe unfortunate, often tragic situations underscores the dominant theme of unrealized aspirations, both for the main protagonists in the story as well as for the people of mid-20th-century Newfoundland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.041
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Central European journal of Canadian studies→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→