Embracing complexity: Clinical and conceptual notes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper will focus on complexity systems theory as a sensibility that informs my psychoanalytic psychotherapeutic practice. Complexity systems theory, along with its non-linear siblings of fractal geometry and chaos theory, will be seen to constitute a conceptual triad that explains the ontological fact of infinite interpenetration of all phenomena and entities in the universe. This fact will be seen to inform a cosmic contextualism that underwrites a set of clinical guidelines for working within a complexity sensibility. A clinical vignette will illustrate a momentous tipping point whereby resisting a trauma informed retreat into formulaic interventions and staying in complexity created the relational condition that allowed a surprising twinship to emerge. A detailed inquiry disclosed the nature of the therapist’s trauma to be the intergenerational transmission of traumatizing systemic antisemitism within Canadian medical schools of the 1930s and 1940s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it