Your Emotions, My Brain: Generalizable Neural Signatures of Emotional Memory Reactivation During Sleep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reactivation in sleep alters the structure of memories and can potentially be used to restructure upsetting representations. Reactivation can be triggered with auditory cues and then detected using machine learning and electroencephalography (EEG), but can we also detect the emotionality of reactivated memories? We examined this by presenting auditory cues that had been associated with negative or neutral stimuli in wake during subsequent NREM sleep and training a classifier to detect the emotionality of subsequent EEG responses. We were able to detect the reinstatement of emotionality 0.4-0.6 seconds after cue presentation. Importantly, we used a between-participant machine learning pipeline to identify shared neural signatures of emotionality across individuals without fine-tuning the model on testing participants. This approach eliminates the need for individualized wake localizer sessions, establishing a methodologically efficient framework for investigating emotional processing during sleep. Detection of emotional reactivation in sleep will help us to understand how such reactivation impacts upon the emotionality of the memories in the long term, potentially facilitating development of treatments for PTSD and depression through memory restructuring in sleep.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".