Endothelial-zippering proceeds by sensing heartbeat-driven force through Cadherin-6 during heart-vessel connection in zebrafish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The connection between the heart and great vessels established during embryogenesis is essential for circulation. However, how great veins adhere to the endocardium lining the inside lumen of the beating heart remains unknown. Here, using zebrafish, we demonstrate that the endocardium and great veins are sealed in a zipper-closing manner outside the beating heart. The gradual elongation of the endocardium, driven by convergent extension, organized this adhesion by pulling venous ECs along the anterior-posterior axis. Time-specific manipulation of the heart rate revealed that this endocardial elongation proceeds against heartbeat-driven force. From time-lapse imaging of adherens junctions, which would counterbalance mechanical forces, we found a specific contribution of Cadherin-6 instead of Cadherin-5 in sensing endocardium-specific mechanical force. This specificity was confirmed by the depletion of Cadherin-6 that caused endocardium deformation. Altogether, we propose Cadherin-6 mediated EC-zippering as a novel mechanism that updates the understanding of Cadherin usage in dynamic morphogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".