Paired plus-minus sequencing is an ultra-high throughput and accurate method for dual strand sequencing of DNA molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Distinguishing real biological variation in the form of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) from errors is a major challenge for genome sequencing technologies. This is particularly true in settings where SNVs are at low frequency such as cancer detection through liquid biopsy, or human somatic mosaicism. State-of-the-art molecular denoising approaches for DNA sequencing rely on duplex sequencing, where both strands of a single DNA molecule are sequenced to discern true variants from errors arising from single stranded DNA damage. However, such duplex approaches typically require massive over-sequencing to overcome low capture rates of duplex molecules. To address these challenges, we introduce paired plus-minus sequencing (ppmSeq) technology, in which both DNA strands are partitioned and clonally amplified on sequencing beads through emulsion PCR. In this reaction, both strands of a double-stranded DNA molecule contribute to a single sequencing read, allowing for a duplex yield that scales linearly with sequencing coverage across a wide range of inputs (1.8-98 ng). We benchmarked ppmSeq against current duplex sequencing technologies, demonstrating superior duplex recovery with ppmSeq, with a rate of 44%±5.5% (compared to ∼5-11% for leading duplex technologies). Using both genomic as well as cell-free DNA, we established error rates for ppmSeq, which had residual SNV detection error rates as low as 7.98×10 -8 for gDNA (using an end-repair protocol with dideoxy nucleotides) and 3.5×10 -7 ±7.5×10 -8 for cell-free DNA. To test the capabilities of ppmSeq for error-corrected whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for clinical application, we assessed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection for disease monitoring in cancer patients. We demonstrated that ppmSeq enables powerful tumor-informed ctDNA detection at concentrations of 10 -4 across most cancers, parts per million sensitivity in cancers with high mutation burden, and further increased sensitivity with higher sequencing depth. We then leveraged genome-wide trinucleotide mutation patterns characteristic of urothelial (APOBEC3-related and platinum exposure-related signatures) and lung (tobacco-exposure-related signatures) cancers to perform tumor-naive ctDNA detection, showing that ppmSeq can identify a disease-specific signal in plasma cell-free DNA without a matched tumor, and that this signal correlates with imaging-based disease metrics. Altogether, ppmSeq provides an error-corrected, cost-efficient and scalable approach for high-fidelity WGS that can be harnessed for challenging clinical applications and emerging frontiers in human somatic genetics where high accuracy is required for mutation identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".