MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413341014 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.11.669689

Paired plus-minus sequencing is an ultra-high throughput and accurate method for dual strand sequencing of DNA molecules

2025· preprint· en· W4413341014 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Pellan Cheng, Itai Rusinek, Aaron Sossin, Adam J. Widman, Eti Meiri, Gat Krieger, Ori Hirschberg, Doron Shem Tov, Shlomit Gilad, Ariel Jaimovich, Omer Barad, Sammantha Avaylon, Srinivas Rajagopalan, Catherine Potenski, Tamara Prieto, Dennis J. Yuan, Rob Furatero, Alexi Runnels, Benjamin M. Costa, Jonathan E. Shoag, Majd Al Assaad, Michael Sigouros, Jyothi Manohar, Abigail King, David Wilkes, John Otilano, Murtaza Malbari, Olivier Elemento, Juan Miguel Mosquera, Nasser K. Altorki, Ashish Saxena, Margaret K. Callahan, Nicolas Robine, Søren Germer, Gilad D. Evrony, Bishoy M. Faltas, Dan A. Landau

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersWeill Cornell Medical CollegeCommon FundNew York Genome CenterNational Cancer InstituteConquer Cancer FoundationNational Institutes of HealthMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterMelanoma Research Alliance
KeywordsDNA sequencingDNA nanoball sequencingDuplex (building)DNASequencing by hybridizationComputational biologyBiologySingle molecule real time sequencingSequencing by ligationHuman genomeDeep sequencingGeneticsGenomeDNA sequencerGenomic libraryGeneBase sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Distinguishing real biological variation in the form of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) from errors is a major challenge for genome sequencing technologies. This is particularly true in settings where SNVs are at low frequency such as cancer detection through liquid biopsy, or human somatic mosaicism. State-of-the-art molecular denoising approaches for DNA sequencing rely on duplex sequencing, where both strands of a single DNA molecule are sequenced to discern true variants from errors arising from single stranded DNA damage. However, such duplex approaches typically require massive over-sequencing to overcome low capture rates of duplex molecules. To address these challenges, we introduce paired plus-minus sequencing (ppmSeq) technology, in which both DNA strands are partitioned and clonally amplified on sequencing beads through emulsion PCR. In this reaction, both strands of a double-stranded DNA molecule contribute to a single sequencing read, allowing for a duplex yield that scales linearly with sequencing coverage across a wide range of inputs (1.8-98 ng). We benchmarked ppmSeq against current duplex sequencing technologies, demonstrating superior duplex recovery with ppmSeq, with a rate of 44%±5.5% (compared to ∼5-11% for leading duplex technologies). Using both genomic as well as cell-free DNA, we established error rates for ppmSeq, which had residual SNV detection error rates as low as 7.98×10 -8 for gDNA (using an end-repair protocol with dideoxy nucleotides) and 3.5×10 -7 ±7.5×10 -8 for cell-free DNA. To test the capabilities of ppmSeq for error-corrected whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for clinical application, we assessed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection for disease monitoring in cancer patients. We demonstrated that ppmSeq enables powerful tumor-informed ctDNA detection at concentrations of 10 -4 across most cancers, parts per million sensitivity in cancers with high mutation burden, and further increased sensitivity with higher sequencing depth. We then leveraged genome-wide trinucleotide mutation patterns characteristic of urothelial (APOBEC3-related and platinum exposure-related signatures) and lung (tobacco-exposure-related signatures) cancers to perform tumor-naive ctDNA detection, showing that ppmSeq can identify a disease-specific signal in plasma cell-free DNA without a matched tumor, and that this signal correlates with imaging-based disease metrics. Altogether, ppmSeq provides an error-corrected, cost-efficient and scalable approach for high-fidelity WGS that can be harnessed for challenging clinical applications and emerging frontiers in human somatic genetics where high accuracy is required for mutation identification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207