MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exercise oncology comes of age

2025· article· en· W4413341260 on OpenAlex
Kathryn H. Schmitz, Joachim Wiskemann, Anne M. May

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Monographs · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsEnthusiasmNexus (standard)OncologyInternal medicineMedicinePsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exercise oncology is coming of age, with more than 30 000 peer-reviewed citations in the scientific literature and multiple guidelines published by major medical institutions based on strong evidence from randomized controlled trials. There is enthusiasm around the formation of a new international organization that will form a nexus for exercise oncology researchers, clinicians, and practitioners. The contents of this monograph document the progression of exercise oncology research and practice, laying the groundwork for the formation of the International Society of Exercise Oncology. The society will aim to be an organizing body to shepherd the field toward the goal of using exercise as standard of care in the setting of oncology in collaboration with existing medical organizations so that every patient can benefit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it