Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling of Concrete Strength: Markov Chains and Regression for Sustainable Mix Design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concrete is fundamental to modern construction, comprising 70% of all building materials and supporting an industry projected to reach $15 trillion by 2030. Predicting compressive strength—a key factor for structural safety and resource efficiency—remains a challenge, as conventional models often fail to capture the dynamic, time-dependent nature of strength development across mix compositions and curing intervals. This study proposes an integrated modeling framework using Markov Chain analysis and regression, validated on 135 samples from 27 mixtures with varying proportions of Portland Cement (PC), Fly Ash (FA), and Blast Furnace Slag (BFS) over curing periods from 3 to 180 days. The Markov Chain framework, integrated with regression analysis, models strength transitions across 10 states (9–42 MPa), with high accuracy (R2 = 0.977, standard error = 3.27 MPa). Curing time (β = 0.079), PC proportion (β = 0.063), and BFS proportion (β = 0.051) are identified as key drivers, while higher FA content (β = 0.019) enhances long-term durability. Model validation using Coefficient of Variation (CoV = 15.57%) and mean absolute error confirms robust and consistent performance across mix designs. The framework supports tailored mix strategies—PC for early strength, BFS for durability, FA for sustainability—empowering engineers to optimize mix selection and curing strategies for efficient and durable concrete applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it