MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413343636 · doi:10.1093/brain/awaf300

Biallelic variants in <i>COX18</i> cause a mitochondrial disorder primarily manifesting as peripheral neuropathy

2025· article· en· W4413343636 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Camila Armirola-Ricaurte, Laura Morant, Isabelle Adant, Sherifa A. Hamed, Menelaos Pipis, Stéphanie Efthymiou, Silvia Amor‐Barris, Derek Atkinson, Liedewei Van de Vondel, Aleksandra Tomić, Sara Seneca, Els De Vriendt, Stephan Züchner, Bart Ghesquière, Michael G. Hanna, Henry Houlden, Michael P. Lunn, Mary M. Reilly, Vedrana Milić Rašić, Albena Jordanova

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research CentreHorizon 2020Seventh Framework ProgrammeUniversiteit AntwerpenMedical Research Council CanadaMuscular Dystrophy AssociationAssociation Belge contre les Maladies Neuro-MusculairesFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekVlaamse regeringFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSHarrington Discovery Institute, University HospitalsWellcome TrustAFM-TéléthonCharcot-Marie-Tooth Association
KeywordsBiologyExome sequencingCompound heterozygosityExonMitochondrial respiratory chainGeneticsMitochondrial diseaseExomeMitochondrionMolecular biologyMutationGeneMitochondrial DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Defects in mitochondrial dynamics are a common cause of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), whereas primary deficiencies in the mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) are rare and atypical for this aetiology. This study aims to report COX18 as a novel CMT-causing gene. This gene encodes an assembly factor of mitochondrial Complex IV that translocates the C-terminal tail of MTCO2 across the mitochondrial inner membrane. Exome sequencing was performed in four affected individuals from three families. The patients and available family members underwent thorough neurological and electrophysiological assessment. The impact of one of the identified variants on splicing, protein levels and mitochondrial bioenergetics was investigated in patient-derived lymphoblasts. The functionality of the mutant protein was assessed using a proteinase K protection assay and immunoblotting. Neuronal relevance of COX18 was assessed in a Drosophila melanogaster knockdown model. Exome sequencing coupled with homozygosity mapping revealed a homozygous splice variant c.435-6A>G in COX18 in two siblings with early-onset progressive axonal sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. By querying external databases, we identified two additional families with rare deleterious biallelic variants in COX18. All eight affected individuals presented with axonal CMT, and some patients also exhibited CNS symptoms, such as dystonia and spasticity. Functional characterization of the c.435-6A>G variant demonstrated that it leads to the expression of an alternative transcript that lacks exon 2, resulting in a stable but defective COX18 isoform. The mutant protein impairs Complex IV assembly and activity, leading to a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential. Downregulation of the COX18 homologue in D. melanogaster resulted in signs of neurodegeneration, including locomotor deficit and progressive axonal degeneration of sensory neurons. Our study presents genetic and functional evidence that supports COX18 as a newly identified gene candidate for autosomal recessive axonal CMT with or without CNS involvement. These findings emphasize the significance of peripheral neuropathy within the spectrum of primary mitochondrial disorders, in addition to the role of mitochondrial Complex IV in the development of CMT. Our research has important implications for the diagnostic work-up of CMT patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207