MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data-based modeling of propeller tip-vortex cavitation noise for realistic acoustic ship signature

2025· article· en· W4413343936 on OpenAlexaff
Youngjoo Kim, Cheolsoo Park, Dokyung Shin, Seunghwan Kim, Keunhwa Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Acoustics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersMinistry of Oceans and FisheriesDefense Acquisition Program AdministrationSejong UniversityKorea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotionKorea Research Institute for Defense Technology Planning and Advancement
KeywordsCavitationPropellerVortexAcousticsSignature (topology)Noise (video)Marine engineeringPhysicsAerospace engineeringEngineeringMechanicsComputer scienceMathematicsGeometryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Propeller tip-vortex cavitation (TVC) noise significantly influences the acoustic signature of a navigating vessel; however, its detailed simulation has not been extensively developed thus far, owing to the complexity of TVC noise. This paper proposes an advanced data-based method for generating propeller TVC noise to enhance the realism of passive sonar simulators. Generative adversarial networks are applied to randomly create waveforms of TVC noise sources, and a probabilistic representation of TVC occurrences is adopted to continuously generate them depending on the ship speed. The proposed method is validated using the performance metrics of statistical measures and auditory features. The signals simulated by the proposed method effectively represent the time–frequency characteristics of the propeller TVC noise depending on the ship speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied AcousticsSame topicCavitation Phenomena in PumpsFrench-language works237,207