MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Reply on RC2

2025· peer-review· en· W4413345820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Wagner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Permafrost soils are particularly vulnerable to climate change. To assess and improve estimations of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) budgets it is necessary to accurately map soil carbon and nitrogen in the permafrost region. In particular, soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks have been predicted and mapped by many studies from local to pan-Arctic scales. Several studies have been carried out at the Canadian Beaufort Sea coast, though no regional synthesis of terrestrial carbon stocks based on spatial modelling has been conducted yet. This study synthesises available field data from the Canadian coastal plain and uses it to map regional SOC and N stocks using the machine learning algorithm random forest and environmental variables based on remote sensing data. We explore local differences in soil properties and how soil data distribution across the region affects the accuracy of the predictions of SOC and N stocks. We mapped SOC and N stocks for the entire region and provide separate models for the coastal mainland area and Qikiqtaruk Herschel Island. We assessed performance of different random forest models by using the Area of Applicability (AOA) method. We further applied the quantile regression forest method to the mainland and Qikiqtaruk Herschel Island models for SOC stocks and compared the results with the AOA method. Our results indicate that not only the selection of data is crucial for the resulting maps, but also the chosen covariates, which were picked by the models as most important. The estimated SOC stock for the upper metre is 56.7 ± 5.6 kg m−2 and the N stock 2.19 ± 0.51 kg m−2. The average SOC stocks vary significantly when including or excluding data in the predictive models. Qikiqtaruk Herschel Island is geologically different from the coastal mainland and has lower SOC stocks. Including Qikiqtaruk Herschel Island soil data to predict SOC stocks at the mainland has large impact on the results. Differences in N stocks were not as dependent on the location as SOC stocks and rather differences between individual studies occurred. The results of the separate models show 36.2 ± 5.7 kg C m−2 and 2.66 ± 0.39 kg N m−2 for Qikiqtaruk Herschel Island and 57.2 ± 4.5 kg C m−2 and 2.17 ± 0.50 kg N m−2 for the mainland. Our results diverge from previous studies of lower resolution, showing the added regional-scale accuracy and precision that can be achieved at intermediate resolution and with sufficient field data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0250.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1330.107

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology→French-language works237,207→