On the Space Observation of Resident Space Objects (RSOs) in Low Earth Orbits (LEOs)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Space debris is an increasingly severe problem in the space industry. According to projections, the number of satellites will increase from the current 10,000 to 100,000 by 2030, specially in LEO orbits. This significant rise in the number of satellites threatens space sustainability, forcing satellites to perform more maneuvers to avoid impacts or leading to the production of more and more space debris due to collisions (Kessler Syndrome). Consequently, substantial efforts have been made to detect and track space debris, leading to the development of the current catalogs. However, with existing technology, detecting and tracking small debris remains challenging. In order to improve the current system, several proposals of Space-Based Situational Awareness (SBSA) have been made. These proposals involve satellites equipped with telescopes to detect space debris and determine their orbits. Unlike prior works, focused primarily on detection rates, this research aims to quantify their accuracy in orbit determination as a function of observation duration, the number of observers, and sensor precision. The Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) is employed as the core estimation algorithm, leveraging both simulated single-case analyses and Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate system performance under various configurations and uncertainties. The results indicate that a constellation of at least three observers with high-precision instruments and sub-kilometer positioning accuracy can reliably estimate debris orbits within an observation period of 4–7 min, with the mean error in position and velocity obtained being 2.2–3 km and 3–4 m/s, respectively. These findings offer critical insights for designing future SBSA constellations and optimizing their operational parameters to address the growing challenge of orbital debris.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".